International Civil Aviation Day: Carbon offsets for aviation are a false climate solution
Today is International Civil Aviation Day and we’re launching a second case study on the false solutions that the International Civil Aviation Authority (ICAO) is basing its climate strategy on. Rather than reducing flying, the industry is betting on carbon offsets and biofuels to tackle its emissions, both of which can have significant impacts on communities, forests and the climate.
“Arauco’s Valdivia biomass power station: carbon emissions and conflicts with Indigenous communities in Chile” looks at a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project that is indicative of the types of projects that could sell carbon credits to the aviation industry through the ICAO’s offsetting scheme, Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). Under CORSIA, airlines will be able to purchase carbon credits sold by certain CDM projects instead of reducing their emissions.
The case study highlights why carbon offsets are a false solution to the climate crisis, and why rolling-out CORSIA at scale would be a disaster for communities and the climate. It describes how pulp and paper giant Arauco is generating carbon credits by burning wood at its Valdivia pulp mill in Wallmapu (southern Chile) in order to sell electricity to the public grid. The pulp mill has caused 25 years of conflict with local Indigenous Mapuche communities, and depends on vast eucalyptus and pine plantations that have fundamentally altered traditional ways of life. On top of this, burning wood to generate electricity is far from clean and green.
Download the first case study “Vallourec: junk offset credits through charcoal production for the iron and steel sector in Brazil” in English and Portuguese.
For more information on CORSIA check out Biofuelwatch’s briefing.