Skip to content
or

Language switcher

Les larmes de crocodile n’aideront pas à éteindre les incendies en Amazonie

24 Aug, 2019
Posted in Blog, Unsustainable Livestock Production,

Photo: Greenpeace

Par Simone Lovera, Global Forest Coalition

Avoir raison ne nous fait pas toujours sentir bien. De fait, lorsque le Fonds vert pour le climat, le plus grand fonds mondial pour le climat, a proposé en janvier dernier d’accorder au Brésil une subvention d’au moins 96,5 millions de dollars pour ses efforts visant à réduire les émissions résultant du déboisement en 2014 et 2015, les ONG ont immédiatement averti que cet argent pourrait littéralement partir en fumée, alors que ces mêmes forêts conservées en 2014 et 2015 étaient menacées de destruction par le nouveau gouvernement brésilien. Nous avons également affirmé que les forêts du Brésil et d’autres pays d’Amérique latine disparaîtraient de toute façon si aucune mesure claire n’était prise pour lutter contre ce qui est de loin le principal facteur de perte de forêts sur le continent: la production de bœuf et de soja destinée à l’exportation. Pourtant, malgré ces préoccupations et bien d’autres, le Fonds vert pour le climat a approuvé la subvention. Pire encore, la production de bœuf et de soja a fortement augmenté en juin, lorsque l’UE et le Mercosur, le bloc commercial sud-américain comprenant le Brésil et d’autres producteurs de bœuf et de soja comme le Paraguay, l’Argentine et l’Uruguay, ont signé un accord de libre-échange assouplissant la règlementation et réduisant les droits de douane sur les exportations de viande et de matières premières vers l’UE.

Continuez à lire en anglais…

Less than 8 months later, the eyes of the whole world are crying crocodile tears over the massively increased forest fires in the Amazon. And fires have not only increased in the Amazon, in neighboring Paraguay and Bolivia 374.000 hectares of Chaco forests have already gone up in flames just this month. The Chaco is the second biggest forest area in Latin America and is also home to numerous Indigenous tribes, including Indigenous Peoples in voluntary isolation. Similar to the Amazon, beef production, and soy production for the intensive livestock industry in Europe and other continents, are by far the main causes of deforestation in the Chaco. That is one of the reasons why the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded only two weeks ago that dietary change is one of the most important and mutually beneficial climate change mitigation measures.

So instead of crying crocodile tears, ordinary citizens and their governments can actually do something to address this crisis. If people are worried about the Amazon and other forests, let them please realize that part of the solution is on the plate in front of them. One does not have to become a complete vegan overnight, but for many people it would definitely be helpful if they would significantly reduce their consumption of meat and dairy and eat more veggies, beans, nuts and fruits – and their body will only be grateful for it too.

But reducing meat and dairy consumption is not just the responsibility of rich consumers. Sadly, the industrial meat and dairy sectors are still enthusiastically supported through generous subsidies and preferential trade deals by exactly the same governments that currently cry ‘fire’ over the Amazon. An immediate withdrawal of all forms of subsidy given to the industrial livestock sector would arguably be one of the most effective ways to halt future fires, and the reform of the EU Common Agricultural Policy is an excellent opportunity to do just that. Forcing the sector to comply with the same environmental—and animal welfare—regulations that other sectors have to comply with would certainly be helpful too. And while the Chinese government can be lauded for being one of the first governments to officially embrace policy to reduce meat consumption amongst its citizens, it is clear that the Chinese government can do far more to prevent further investments in Amazon destruction. For example, it could halt investments in ports, roads and other infrastructure that facilitates beef and soy exports from Latin America.

And last but not least, adopting a free trade agreement that will increase meat and soy exports from Brazil and other South American countries completely contradicts the Paris Agreement and the internationally-agreed Sustainable Development Goal target to halt deforestation by 2020. It is very welcome in this respect that the leaders of EU countries like Ireland and France are threatening not to ratify the EU-Mercosur trade agreement. If other EU countries are serious about climate change and deforestation at all, they should immediately follow this stance and put this agreement where it belongs: in the bottom of a very deep and dark drawer.

The past twenty years have shown all too well that simply throwing money at forests does not save them: rather, it is high time we stopped supporting the drivers of forest loss.